From our sister institution the Carnegie Endowment, a recent report shows the unequal impact of the US-originated financial crisis on developing economies and the need for a fairer globalization:
The Unequal Impact of the Economic Crisis
Leaders of the G8 nations meeting in L'Aquila Italy acknowledged in a joint statement that there are signs the world economy is stabilizing, but cautioned that "significant risks remain."
Analysis from Carnegie's International Economic Bulletinsupports this conclusion, finding that although the preconditions for economic recovery have begun to develop, it is still too early to say that a sustained global recovery is imminent.
The Bulletin explores how the impact of the crisis and the chance for recovery vary in regions around the world, with a particular focus on Africa, Central Asia, China, the Middle East, and Russia. It shows that although the United States is at the epicenter of the global economic crisis, it is one of the countries least affected by the financial fallout. Large industrialized nations like the United States, Japan, and Germany have benefited from increasing global demand for relatively stable economies in which to invest. Instead, it is several developing countries, notably those with vulnerable capital accounts and weak macroeconomic fundamentals, that are experiencing severe economic downturns disproportionate to their roles in the crisis.
| Rank | Country | Currency Depreciation(%) | Equity Market(%) | Bond Spreads(Bps)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ukraine | -59.9 | -66 | 733 |
2 | Argentina | -21.4 | -58 | 735 |
3 | Hungary | -18.9 | -58 | 283 |
3 | Poland | -35.2 | -53 | 127 |
5 | Jamaica | -20.4 | -51 | 439 |
6 | Ghana | -28 | -35 | 448 |
7 | Russia | -22 | -44 | 144 |
8 | Kazakhstan | -26 | -34 | 167 |
9 | Bulgaria | -1.5 | -51 | 175 |
10 | Mexico | -22.6 | -35 | 73 |
| * The difference between a country's bond interest rate and the interest rate on the U.S. treasury bond. The higher the number, the less confidence there is that a country can repay its loan. | ||||
Both rankings were determined by comparing currency devaluations, equity market declines, and rising sovereign bond spreads because these measures tend to track developments in the real economy during times of economic crisis when financial strain handicaps consumption, investment, and in many cases government spending, which limits GDP and employment growth.
| Rank | Country | Currency Depreciation(%) | Equity Market(%) | Bond Spreads(Bps)* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | China | 0.3 | -11 | -31 |
2 | Japan | 9.2 | -17 | -5 |
3 | United States | 0 | -24 | 0 |
3 | South Africa | 1.5 | -20 | 39 |
5 | Peru | -0.4 | -15 | 42 |
6 | Philippines | -0.1 | -21 | 53 |
7 | Malaysia | -0.9 | -12 | 81 |
8 | Germany | -1.2 | -34 | 0 |
9 | Colombia | -3.4 | -10 | 63 |
10 | France | -1.2 | -34 | 11 |
| * The difference between a country's bond interest rate and the interest rate on the U.S. treasury bond. The higher the number, the less confidence there is that a country can repay its loan. | ||||
The global economic meltdown has shown that even when a crisis originates in industrialized countries, developing countries pay the highest price. This underlies why developing countries have a crucial interest in the financial soundness of large economies like the United States. This helps explain why the G20, rather than the G8, is leading the effort to design a regime to govern international finance, and why Brazil, Russia, India, and China (the BRICs) organized their first summit to discuss, among other things, the role of the dollar as its reserve currency.
For more details on countries most and least affected by the crisis, please visit the International Economic Bulletin.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment